As of 30 September 2026. Information only, not legal advice – see the disclaimer.
| Full title | Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations |
|---|---|
| Type | UN General Assembly resolution (declaration) |
| Adopted by | UN General Assembly, resolution 2625 (XXV) |
| Adopted | 24 October 1970, without a vote |
| Legal status | Non-binding as a resolution; the International Court of Justice has treated several of its principles as reflecting customary international law |
| Official text | UN Doc. A/RES/2625 (XXV) |
| Subject area | Use of force, intervention and cyber operations; Propaganda, disinformation and elections |
The Friendly Relations Declaration was adopted on the 25th anniversary of the United Nations. It elaborates seven principles derived from the Charter: the prohibition of the threat or use of force, the peaceful settlement of disputes, non-intervention in matters within the domestic jurisdiction of any State, the duty to co-operate, equal rights and self-determination of peoples, sovereign equality, and the fulfilment in good faith of Charter obligations. It is the standard reference text for the inter-State principle of non-intervention. In debates on cyber and information operations it is cited in particular on non-intervention, on the duty to refrain from propaganda for wars of aggression, and on the duty not to organise or support subversive activities directed at another State.
In Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (1986) the International Court of Justice relied on the Declaration as evidence of opinio juris for the principles of non-use of force and non-intervention and identified coercion as the defining element of prohibited intervention (see icj_nicaragua). The 2015 GGE report (A/70/174, para. 28) lists non-intervention in the internal affairs of other States among the principles applicable to State use of ICTs. Several national positions on international law and cyberspace (compiled in UN Doc. A/76/136) discuss whether cyber operations directed at elections or other governmental functions, or large-scale information operations, can meet the threshold of coercion; States differ on how the coercion element should be understood. The duty to refrain from propaganda for wars of aggression is referred to in discussions on information operations, together with Art. 20 ICCPR (see iccpr) and the 1936 Broadcasting Convention (see broadcasting_1936).
No recent developments recorded.